<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Glo Networks Technical Blog (Glo Blog) &#187; Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.glo-networks.com/category/desktops/desktopsw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.glo-networks.com</link>
	<description>Glo Networks team sharing their technical experiences and thoughts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:35:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SSD Speeds: Are we being mislead?</title>
		<link>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2011/10/12/ssd-speeds-are-we-being-mislead/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2011/10/12/ssd-speeds-are-we-being-mislead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktops and Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackmagic Disk Speed Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disk Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disk Speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disk Write]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.glo-networks.com/?p=1092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a previous post we talked about the difference in disk read/write speed when enabling and disabling FileVault on a MacBook Pro fitted with an SSD. The software used to test was ‘Blackmagic Disk Speed Test’ which is available straight off the Mac App store. Since that post there’s been an update for the software, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a previous <a title="OS X 10.7 (Lion) FileVault Overhead" href="http://blog.glo-networks.com/2011/08/17/os-x-10-7-lion-filevault-overhead/" target="_blank">post </a>we talked about the difference in disk read/write speed when enabling and disabling FileVault on a MacBook Pro fitted with an SSD. The software used to test was ‘Blackmagic Disk Speed Test’ which is available straight off the <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/blackmagic-disk-speed-test/id425264550?mt=12" target="_blank">Mac App store</a>.</p>
<p>Since that post there’s been an update for the software, and this update has brought something a bit fishy to our attention.</p>
<p>First let’s discuss what this update has changed. Directly from the product page on the App Store:</p>
<p><em><a href="http://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/blackmagic-disk-speed-test/id425264550?mt=12">What&#8217;s New in Version 2.1</a></em></p>
<p><em><a href="http://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/blackmagic-disk-speed-test/id425264550?mt=12">Some SSD&#8217;s use hidden compression when writing data to make their benchmarked speeds appear faster. Disk Speed Test will now measure the true speed of these SSD&#8217;s so you know if they are suitable for high quality uncompressed video capture.</a></em></p>
<p>The people that produce the software say the new update takes account for the ‘hidden compression’ used by SSD manufacturers, and measures the  ‘true speed’. So what difference does it actually make?  Here are some results we came up with:</p>
<table border="0" width="200">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/No-FileVault.png"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1067" title="After Update" src="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/No-FileVault-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></td>
<td><a href="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Screen-Shot-2011-10-11-at-8-43-06.png"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1095" title="After Update" src="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Screen-Shot-2011-10-11-at-8-43-06-150x150.png" alt="After Update" width="150" height="150" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center"><a href="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/With-FileVault.png">Before Update</a></td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/No-FileVault.png">After Update</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As you can see there’s a HUGE drop in the speeds the software reports! The SSD in question, a Corsair Force 3 240Gb SSD, is sold with the following specs listed:</p>
<p>Read Performance (max)             550 MB/s</p>
<p>Write Performance (max)            520 MB/s</p>
<p>The two logical conclusions that can come from this are:</p>
<p>SSD Manufacturers are artificially inflating the Read/Write speeds in order to put better looking specs on their SSDs</p>
<p>OR</p>
<p>The software, post update, is reporting things wrong or in an unorthodox manner.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a few bells ringing here, this reminds us of the old hard drive capacity description discrepancy <a href="http://techreport.com/discussions.x/10269" target="_blank">argument </a>that went on for some time or possibly of the IPS broadband &#8216;up to&#8217; speed claims <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/broadband/359779/ofcom-finally-tires-of-fantasy-broadband-speeds">issue</a>.  Could we be seeing a similar overstatement from SSD manufacturers regards typical speeds?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2011/10/12/ssd-speeds-are-we-being-mislead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Windows Snipping Tool &#8211; Screen Shots made Simple(er)</title>
		<link>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2011/06/07/the-windows-snipping-tool-screen-shots-made-simpleer/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2011/06/07/the-windows-snipping-tool-screen-shots-made-simpleer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktops and Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print Screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screen Grabs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screen Shots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snipping Tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.glo-networks.com/?p=996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you’re looking for help with an IT problem a simple screen shot can be a powerful ally. Most Windows users are aware of the Print Screen key and its function (to capture what is displayed on the screen/s and copy it to the clipboard). A small drawback to taking a screen shot this way [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="Snipping Tool" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d3/Snipping_Tool_Vista.png" alt="The Snipping Tool" width="144" height="77" />When you’re looking for help with an IT problem a simple screen shot can be a powerful ally. Most Windows users are aware of the Print Screen key and its function (to capture what is displayed on the screen/s and copy it to the clipboard). A small drawback to taking a screen shot this way is the necessity to paste the captured image from the clipboard into another program in order to save it.</p>
<p>Because of this here at Glo Networks we receive a large amount of screen shots saved inside Microsoft Word files. While this isn’t exactly a problem it does make the files slightly larger than necessary and also increases the time it takes for us to open them (as we don’t always have Word loaded). This is where the Windows Snipping Tool can be very useful</p>
<p>The Snipping tool was introduced in Windows Vista and is also present in Windows 7 (though not the Home Basic edition) and Windows Server 2008 R2. Its function is to take screen shots, and it offers some handy tools to do so. You can chose to take Free-form, Rectangular, Window, or Full-screen screen shots, or Snips as it calls them, and then you can immediately either Save the Snip to file as a PNG, JPG, GIF or MHT file, or insert the file to into a new email (either as an embedded image or a attachment). It also includes a pen tool to make simple annotations to the snip and a highlighter.</p>
<p>The Snipping Tool is incredibly simple to use and perfect for its purpose. Spend a little time checking it out and you’ll get to grips with it in no time at all, or you can check out instructions on its use <a href="http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/Use-Snipping-Tool-to-capture-screen-shots" target="_blank">here</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2011/06/07/the-windows-snipping-tool-screen-shots-made-simpleer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>End of Support: Windows Vista SP1</title>
		<link>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2011/05/24/end-of-support-windows-vista-sp1/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2011/05/24/end-of-support-windows-vista-sp1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 20:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktops and Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.glo-networks.com/?p=973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Support for Windows Vista Service Pack 1 (SP1) ends on July 12 2011. As always this means Windows Vista SP1 will no longer receive software updates from Windows/Microsoft Update, including security updates. If you&#8217;ve still got Vista devices deployed on your network we highly recommend that they are patched to SP2. As always, if your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Support for Windows Vista Service Pack 1 (SP1) ends on July 12 2011. As always this means Windows Vista SP1 will no longer receive software updates from Windows/Microsoft Update, including security updates.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve still got Vista devices deployed on your network we highly recommend that they are patched to <a title="KB948465: Information about Service Pack 2 for Windows Vista and for Windows Server 2008" href="http://support.microsoft.com/KB/948465" target="_blank">SP2</a>.</p>
<p>As always, if your devices are managed by a Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) server, you can enforce SP2 from there. If your WSUS server is running on Windows 2003 be aware that you may need to install another KB article in order for it to be picked up correctly. Full details over on <a title="Deploying by using WSUS" href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd335037%28WS.10%29.aspx#Scen3" target="_blank">Technet</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2011/05/24/end-of-support-windows-vista-sp1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outlook File Association</title>
		<link>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2011/03/03/outlook-file-association/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2011/03/03/outlook-file-association/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 09:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktops and Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook File Association]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.glo-networks.com/?p=941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For some time now my install of Outlook 2010 has been able to preview Word documents ok in the reading pane but the full file association has been set to Adobe Illustrator. If I save the file out to the file system and double click it, it works perfectly. So the issues is something inside [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Outlook-Attchements.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-942" title="Outlook Attchements" src="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Outlook-Attchements.png" alt="" width="107" height="100" /></a>For some time now my install of Outlook 2010 has been able to preview  Word documents ok in the reading pane but the full file association has  been set to Adobe Illustrator. If I save the file out to the file system  and double click it, it works perfectly. So the issues is something  inside Outlook only ?</p>
<p>A lot of digging around and finding everyone offering fixes was just doing the usual Windows file associations I found <a href="http://www.winhelponline.com/blog/unable-to-open-doc-attachments-windows-mail-or-wlm/" target="_blank">this</a>.</p>
<p>Was  rather concerned about running an exe from an unknown site but after  some exhaustive scans I took the plunge. Fixed the problem first time on  my Windows 7 x64 box. Big thank you to <a href="http://www.winhelponline.com" target="_blank">winhelponline.com</a>, would love to  know what it does though <img src='http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2011/03/03/outlook-file-association/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple and Microsoft now equal in market capitalisation</title>
		<link>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2010/05/28/apple-and-microsoft-now-equal-in-market-capitalisation/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2010/05/28/apple-and-microsoft-now-equal-in-market-capitalisation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 13:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktop Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktops and Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laptop Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.glo-networks.com/?p=733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems what was left of Microsoft’s diminishing lead in market capitalisation has finally been eaten up by Apple (or at least by one measure of market capitalization). While this probably will not come as a surprise to those who are interested in such things; when looking at the history of both companies it does [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems what was left of Microsoft’s diminishing lead in market capitalisation has finally been eaten up by Apple (or at least by one measure of market capitalization). While this probably will not come as a surprise to those who are interested in such things; when looking at the history of both companies it does mark an important milestone.</p>
<p>With both companies founded in 1975 this has been no short journey for either. However since that time Microsoft has maintained its dominance pretty much consistently, and it has only really been in the last 10 years (which has seen the release of such iconic Apple products as the iPod, iPhone and the Macbook) that Apple providing a challenge to Microsoft’s market supremacy.</p>
<p>Through out the &#8217;00&#8242;s Apple  created several iconic, genre leading products with which Microsoft have seemed to struggled to compete . Business products aside, we would challenge you to offer a Microsoft product in the last 5 years that rivals Apples innovation. One possible exception worth considering is the Xbox 360, which was  ground breaking in terms of online connectivity when released in 2005. That said Apple have yet to enter the console gaming market!</p>
<p>More information and figures can be found in the following articles: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/apple-and-microsoft-now-neck-and-neck-in-market-capitalization/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed:+weblogsinc/engadget+(Engadget)&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_blank">Engadget</a>, <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/d4482636-690f-11df-910b-00144feab49a.html" target="_blank">Financial Times</a>, <a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/business-and-law-brief/49957-and-here-it-comes-apple-market-cap-exceeds-microsofts?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed:+tgdaily_all_sections+(TG+Daily+-+All+News)&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_blank">TGDaily</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2010/05/28/apple-and-microsoft-now-equal-in-market-capitalisation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gmail in the UK</title>
		<link>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2010/05/04/gmail-in-the-uk/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2010/05/04/gmail-in-the-uk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 09:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktops and Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail in the UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[googlemail no more]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.glo-networks.com/?p=716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thought this was an interesting little change of events. Google offers email services world wide and has done for sometime now. It&#8217;s called gmail everywhere bar here in the UK where it&#8217;s called googlemail. Some other UK company was using the name gmail in something and stopped Google from being able to use it. Well [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/googlechrome_180_119.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-73" title="googlechrome" src="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/googlechrome_180_119-150x119.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="119" /></a>Thought this was an interesting little change of events. Google offers email services world wide and has done for sometime now. It&#8217;s called gmail everywhere bar here in the UK where it&#8217;s called googlemail. Some other UK company was using the name gmail in something and stopped Google from being able to use it.</p>
<p><a href="http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2010/05/google-mail-is-becoming-gmail-in-uk.html" target="_blank">Well that&#8217;s about to change according to Google.</a></p>
<p>I wonder if the UK company using gmail has gone under or if they just let Google have their way ? It&#8217;s only good news in our eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2010/05/04/gmail-in-the-uk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dynamics CRM 4 and Outlook 2010</title>
		<link>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2010/04/27/dynamics-crm-4-and-outlook-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2010/04/27/dynamics-crm-4-and-outlook-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktops and Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRM 4 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRM and Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dynamics CRM 4 and Outlook 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office 2010 and CRM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.glo-networks.com/?p=708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Office 2010 has just been released and with the lovely Outlook 2010 we just have to get stuck in to using it of course. We really like the People Pane and the cleaner calander views for starters. We&#8217;ve tried clean installs and inplace upgrade, all without a hitch. So do take the plunge when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Office-2010.gif"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-710" title="Office 2010" src="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Office-2010.gif" alt="" width="196" height="58" /></a>So Office 2010 has just been released and with the lovely Outlook 2010 we just have to get stuck in to using it of course. We really like the People Pane and the cleaner calander views for starters.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve tried clean installs and inplace upgrade, all without a hitch. So do take the plunge when you have time.</p>
<p>Not really supprisingly but Outlook 2010 and Dynamics CRM 4 only work together in 32 bit mode. It completely falls appart if you install Outlook in 64 bit mode ! A 64bit version of the CRM Outlook client doesn&#8217;t appear to be on the way either <img src='http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> . Mind you the 32bit version of Outlook runs exactly the same as the 64but one as you&#8217;d expect.</p>
<p>And interestingly we managed to find a new CRM 4 error that didn&#8217;t happen when running with Outlook 2007. When trying to &#8216;Track in CRM&#8217; an email you get an error &#8216;The text entered exceeds the maximum length.&#8217;. Luckly there&#8217;s a simple fix -</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/CRM4-Error-Fix.gif"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-711" title="CRM4-Error-Fix" src="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/CRM4-Error-Fix.gif" alt="" width="221" height="348" /> </a>&#8211;&gt; Load Outlook with the fulling patched and configured CRM client.<br />
&#8211;&gt; Settings &gt; Customization &gt;  Customize Entities &gt;  E-mail &gt; Attributes &gt; messageid<br />
&#8211;&gt; Update the Maximum Length field from 100  (default) to 20<span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">0</span><br />
&#8211;&gt; Save and Close<br />
&#8211;&gt; Actions &gt; Publish<br />
&#8211;&gt; Save and Close</p>
<p>That should be it.</p>
<ol></ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2010/04/27/dynamics-crm-4-and-outlook-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>POP3 not for Business</title>
		<link>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2010/03/18/pop3-not-for-business/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2010/03/18/pop3-not-for-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktops and Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POP3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POP3 backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POP3 not for businesses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.glo-networks.com/?p=654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many ways to receive email to your devices with POP3 being about the most basic one. It&#8217;s also one of the oldest internet protocols and is perfect for just getting emails off a server to your PC. Its problems come from the fact that its about all you can do with it. So [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/icon_email.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-662" title="icon_email" src="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/icon_email-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>There are many ways to receive email to your devices with <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1939" target="_blank">POP3</a> being about the most basic one. It&#8217;s also one of the oldest internet protocols and is perfect for just getting emails off a server to your PC.</p>
<p>Its problems come from the fact that its about all you can do with it. So when you use your email client to receive you emails they pull them off the server onto your desktop or laptop. That&#8217;s then their only location, inside your chosen email client. So how many people bother to backup that local email store ? How many people know where it is ? How many people have even thought about that ? Even when you do think about backups and carry them out it&#8217;s a laborious task that gets more complex the more users you have.</p>
<p>Another thought is that all of POP3 is done in plain text. What that means is that if someone (say a college) wants to, they can load a simple network tool to gather information from the network. Not only will they see the content of your emails they&#8217;ll also see the username and password you use to connect to it ! (Yes there&#8217;s an SSL&#8217;ed version of POP3 but it&#8217;s very rarely used).</p>
<p>Now consider that you can now get fully <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/online/en-gb/exchange-online.mspx" target="_blank">hosted Exchange</a> services from £3.36 per month per mailbox. So for your 5 user business you can get arguably the industry standard email platform with 25GB of hosted storage for only £201.60 per year ! That’s fully managed servers with no need to buy a server, no need to worry about backups, no need to think about DR (Disaster Recovery). And of course you get all the benefits of the an Exchange server like shared calenders, Outlook Web Access (Outlook Anywhere), Exchange Active Sync (for iPhone and mobile devices) and many more.</p>
<p>Or there&#8217;s the likes of a gmail service for your business. When we last put it in for a customer it was about £33 per user per year for the Google Apps Premier Edition. Of course there&#8217;s also the free gmail account that you could use !</p>
<p>Surely knowing all that you&#8217;d say that there&#8217;s no place in business for POP3. If you&#8217;re still using POP3 for your business emails we&#8217;ll happily help you change to something that&#8217;s more suited. Ask nicely we may even do it for free !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2010/03/18/pop3-not-for-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Office 2010 June Release</title>
		<link>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2010/03/09/microsoft-office-2010-june-release/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2010/03/09/microsoft-office-2010-june-release/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft; Office 2010; Office 2007]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.glo-networks.com/?p=619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A date has been set for the release of the latest edition of Microsoft’s Office productivity suite. According to Paul Thurrott in his WinInfo blog, Office 2010 will be generally available from the 15th of June 2010. This has since been backed up by an MS spokesman who has stated  “we expect Office 2010 and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A date has been set for the release of the latest edition of Microsoft’s Office productivity suite. According to Paul Thurrott in his <a href="http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/wininfo-short-takes-week-of-february-15-2010.aspx" target="_blank">WinInfo blog</a>, Office 2010 will be generally available from the 15<sup>th</sup> of June 2010. This has since been backed up by an MS spokesman who has stated  “we expect Office 2010 and related products to be generally available in June 2010&#8243;.</p>
<p>The product has been in development since 2006  and the beta has been around for a while. The release candidate (RC) version was made available to MSDN testers on the 5<sup>th</sup> of February.</p>
<p>Microsoft have also announced that customers purchasing copies Microsoft Office 2007 (from authorised resellers) between between 5<sup>th</sup> of March and the 30<sup>th</sup> of September will be able to download Office 2010 at no extra cost when available. So anyone who is looking to purchase the productivity suite software now need not worry about having an old version. For full details see <a href="http://office2010.microsoft.com/en-gb/tech-guarantee/microsoft-office-2010-technology-guaranteeunited-kingdom-FX101829423.aspx?CTT=97" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>We have, of course, been testing out Microsoft Office 2010 for ourselves here at Glo (in fact this blog post was drafted in Word 2010). Keep an eye for out for a blog on our thoughts sometime soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2010/03/09/microsoft-office-2010-june-release/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SMS from Client Desktops</title>
		<link>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2010/02/25/sms-from-client-desktops/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2010/02/25/sms-from-client-desktops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMS; Faxing; Communications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.glo-networks.com/?p=603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Faxing from user desktops is an IT solution Glo Networks have been able to provide to several customers but a short while ago we were asked about something new to us: sending SMS from user desktops. After some investigation we found our chosen faxing software, GFI Faxmaker, could also be configured to send SMS. This [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faxing from user desktops is an IT solution Glo Networks have been able to provide to several customers but a short while ago we were asked about something new to us: sending SMS from user desktops.</p>
<p>After some investigation we found our chosen faxing software, GFI Faxmaker, could also be configured to send SMS. This is done via a third party SMS gateway, namely Clickatell.</p>
<p>SMS credits are purchased from 3rd Party supplier and Faxmaker is then setup to forward outgoing SMS to the online gateway. Now all the user has to do is send an email to <em>mobileno</em>@specifieddomain.com and the body of the email will be sent to the mobile as SMS.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve already set this up for one customer and would be more than happy to discuss/answer any queries regards the solution.  Please feel free to contact us for more information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2010/02/25/sms-from-client-desktops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

