<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Glo Networks Technical Blog (Glo Blog) &#187; SSD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.glo-networks.com/tag/ssd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.glo-networks.com</link>
	<description>Glo Networks team sharing their technical experiences and thoughts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:35:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SSD Speeds: Are we being mislead?</title>
		<link>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2011/10/12/ssd-speeds-are-we-being-mislead/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2011/10/12/ssd-speeds-are-we-being-mislead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktops and Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackmagic Disk Speed Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disk Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disk Speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disk Write]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.glo-networks.com/?p=1092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a previous post we talked about the difference in disk read/write speed when enabling and disabling FileVault on a MacBook Pro fitted with an SSD. The software used to test was ‘Blackmagic Disk Speed Test’ which is available straight off the Mac App store. Since that post there’s been an update for the software, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a previous <a title="OS X 10.7 (Lion) FileVault Overhead" href="http://blog.glo-networks.com/2011/08/17/os-x-10-7-lion-filevault-overhead/" target="_blank">post </a>we talked about the difference in disk read/write speed when enabling and disabling FileVault on a MacBook Pro fitted with an SSD. The software used to test was ‘Blackmagic Disk Speed Test’ which is available straight off the <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/blackmagic-disk-speed-test/id425264550?mt=12" target="_blank">Mac App store</a>.</p>
<p>Since that post there’s been an update for the software, and this update has brought something a bit fishy to our attention.</p>
<p>First let’s discuss what this update has changed. Directly from the product page on the App Store:</p>
<p><em><a href="http://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/blackmagic-disk-speed-test/id425264550?mt=12">What&#8217;s New in Version 2.1</a></em></p>
<p><em><a href="http://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/blackmagic-disk-speed-test/id425264550?mt=12">Some SSD&#8217;s use hidden compression when writing data to make their benchmarked speeds appear faster. Disk Speed Test will now measure the true speed of these SSD&#8217;s so you know if they are suitable for high quality uncompressed video capture.</a></em></p>
<p>The people that produce the software say the new update takes account for the ‘hidden compression’ used by SSD manufacturers, and measures the  ‘true speed’. So what difference does it actually make?  Here are some results we came up with:</p>
<table border="0" width="200">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/No-FileVault.png"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1067" title="After Update" src="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/No-FileVault-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></td>
<td><a href="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Screen-Shot-2011-10-11-at-8-43-06.png"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1095" title="After Update" src="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Screen-Shot-2011-10-11-at-8-43-06-150x150.png" alt="After Update" width="150" height="150" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center"><a href="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/With-FileVault.png">Before Update</a></td>
<td align="center"><a href="http://blog.glo-networks.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/No-FileVault.png">After Update</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As you can see there’s a HUGE drop in the speeds the software reports! The SSD in question, a Corsair Force 3 240Gb SSD, is sold with the following specs listed:</p>
<p>Read Performance (max)             550 MB/s</p>
<p>Write Performance (max)            520 MB/s</p>
<p>The two logical conclusions that can come from this are:</p>
<p>SSD Manufacturers are artificially inflating the Read/Write speeds in order to put better looking specs on their SSDs</p>
<p>OR</p>
<p>The software, post update, is reporting things wrong or in an unorthodox manner.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a few bells ringing here, this reminds us of the old hard drive capacity description discrepancy <a href="http://techreport.com/discussions.x/10269" target="_blank">argument </a>that went on for some time or possibly of the IPS broadband &#8216;up to&#8217; speed claims <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/broadband/359779/ofcom-finally-tires-of-fantasy-broadband-speeds">issue</a>.  Could we be seeing a similar overstatement from SSD manufacturers regards typical speeds?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2011/10/12/ssd-speeds-are-we-being-mislead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SSD (Solid State Drive)</title>
		<link>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2009/09/22/ssd-solid-state-drive/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2009/09/22/ssd-solid-state-drive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktop Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktops and Laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laptop Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD Speed Tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Why SSD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.glo-net.net/?p=276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So firstly what&#8217;s an SSD. In your computer you have a HD (hard disk drive) that is effectively some mini CDs spinning very quickly. These mini CDs store all your data and run your OS (Windows or OS X for the majority of us). They&#8217;ve been around for over 10 years and today you can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-277" title="Samsung-SSD-Flash" src="http://blog.glo-net.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Samsung-SSD-Flash-300x220.jpg" alt="Samsung-SSD-Flash" width="300" height="220" />So firstly what&#8217;s an SSD. In your computer you have a HD (hard disk drive) that is effectively some mini CDs spinning very quickly. These mini CDs store all your data and run your OS (Windows or OS X for the majority of us). They&#8217;ve been around for over 10 years and today you can pick up a 1Tb drive for under £60 delivered. Those spinning HDs run noisy, hot, slow and really don&#8217;t like to be bumped. SSDs however solve all those problems.</p>
<p>RAM in your computer runs a lot quicker than your HD and has a very different job. Over the last few years people have been in effect making HDs out of RAM. Think of HD technology as the steam age and SSDs are the oil age of cars.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve recently put a <a href="http://www.corsair.com/products/ssd_extreme/default.aspx" target="_blank">64Gb Corsair Extreme SSD</a> in a PC and popped the OS on it (about £150 delivered). Loading programs and booting the OS are so much quicker. What caught us by surprise though was that when you load something you&#8217;re used to the whiring and clicking of the HD in the machine sitting next to you. This is completely done and actualy quite disconcerting to start with. We can see this obviously being of a huge benefit to laptop users and as such are keeping our eyes open for when the 300Gb SSDs are the right price.</p>
<p>Here are a few basic speed tests for storage in a PC -<br />
<a href="http://blog.glo-net.net/wp-includes/images/SSDimages/HD.gif" target="_blank">1Tb Samsung 5400rpm HD</a><br />
<a href="http://blog.glo-net.net/wp-includes/images/SSDimages/SSD.gif" target="_blank">64Gb Corsair Extreme SSD</a><br />
<a href="http://blog.glo-net.net/wp-includes/images/SSDimages/USB.gif" target="_blank">8Gb Sony USB Memory Stick</a><br />
<a href="http://blog.glo-net.net/wp-includes/images/SSDimages/HDsRAID0.gif" target="_blank">2 x 500Gb Samsung 7200rpm HD (RAID 0)</a><br />
<a href="http://blog.glo-net.net/wp-includes/images/SSDimages/HDsRAID5.gif" target="_blank">3 x 500Gb Samsung 7200rpm HD (RAID 5)</a></p>
<p>HDs will always have their place for mass storage but running your OS and programs on an SSD (or an array of SSDs) really does make a differnce. It&#8217;s as clear as walking 400 miles or flying 400 miles !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.glo-networks.com/2009/09/22/ssd-solid-state-drive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

